{"id":6450,"date":"2016-01-31T07:42:33","date_gmt":"2016-01-31T12:42:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/?p=6450"},"modified":"2016-02-02T07:47:20","modified_gmt":"2016-02-02T12:47:20","slug":"chinas-gandhi-jailed-for-five-years-in-guangzhou-three-verdict","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/chinas-gandhi-jailed-for-five-years-in-guangzhou-three-verdict","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;China&#8217;s Gandhi&#8217; Jailed For Five Years in Guangzhou Three Verdict"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_6451\" style=\"width: 490px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-6451\" class=\"wp-image-6451\" src=\"http:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/files\/2016\/02\/Tang-Jingling.jpg\" alt=\"Tang Jingling\" width=\"480\" height=\"395\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/files\/2016\/02\/Tang-Jingling.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/files\/2016\/02\/Tang-Jingling-300x247.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 480px) 100vw, 480px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-6451\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Guangzhou rights lawyer Tang Jingling in an undated photo. (Photo courtesy of a family member.)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Authorities in the southern Chinese province of Guangdong on Friday handed down jail terms of up to five years to the &#8220;Guangzhou Three&#8221; rights activists for subversion, after they sought to launch a civil disobedience campaign to protect human rights.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The Guangzhou Intermediate People&#8217;s Court sentenced former rights lawyer Tang Jingling to five years&#8217; imprisonment, while fellow activists Wang Qingying and Yuan Xinting were handed sentences of two-and-a-half and three-and-a-half years respectively.<\/p>\n<p>All three had been found guilty of &#8220;incitement to subvert state power.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I think that this sentence by the [ruling] Chinese Communist Party and the Guangzhou Intermediate People&#8217;s Court is an extreme error of judgment that nonetheless recognizes the contribution of Tang Jingling to the democracy movement in China,&#8221; Tang&#8217;s lawyer Ge Yongxi told RFA after the verdict and sentencing hearing.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Tang Jingling has said that he won&#8217;t be appealing, because he says the judicial system under the Chinese Communist Party has no legitimacy,&#8221; Ge said. &#8220;He said he will appeal to the people of China, and to God, instead.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Tang&#8217;s wife Wang Yanfang said she respects her husband&#8217;s decision not to lodge an appeal.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I respect his choice, because we all know that they are all [three of them] innocent, and the court and the prosecutors know that very well, and yet they still locked them all up for more than a year,&#8221; Wang said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The trial itself wasn&#8217;t legal; courts should be fair and reasonable places, but they aren&#8217;t any more,&#8221; she said. &#8220;So really it makes no difference whether they appeal or not; it&#8217;s meaningless.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Wang said around 10 family members were allowed to attend the sentencing hearing.<\/p>\n<p>Asked how her husband looked after more than a year of separation, she said: &#8220;He&#8217;s much thinner.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Security was tight outside the court building, where a group of supporters tried to evade detention by police and security guards, activists said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There were a lot [of supporters]; I saw several dozen,&#8221; an activist who gave only a nickname Kuang Ma told RFA.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There were also a lot of police and police vehicles, and they were shooting video of the supporters,&#8221; she said.<\/p>\n<p><b>\u2018Pure political persecution\u2019<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Rights activists slammed the verdict as a form of political persecution.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This is pure political persecution,&#8221; Guangdong rights activist Jia Pin told RFA. &#8220;These guys didn&#8217;t do anything to break the law.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;And most of their activities were very moderate in nature, like civil disobedience actions to try to get Chinese society to be a bit more progressive, and to push China a bit closer to democracy,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;They aren&#8217;t just innocent; they also did a lot to help the citizens of this country, using very positive actions,&#8221; Jia said.<\/p>\n<p>According to the overseas-based Chinese Human Rights Defenders (CHRD) network, the court\u2019s decision &#8220;sends a clear and defiant message from the Xi [Jinping] government that it is determined to punish those exercising and defending human rights.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Tang, who was strip of his license to practice law by the authorities, was detained after he tried to launch a nonviolent civil disobedience movement along with fellow activists, earning him the nickname &#8220;China&#8217;s Gandhi.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>According to CHRD, Tang received a longer sentence than the others because of his position as the leader of the movement.<\/p>\n<p>All three men had played a prominent role in press freedom protests centered on the <i>Southern Weekend <\/i>newspaper in early 2013, as well as taken part in commemorative activities for the 25th anniversary of the Tiananmen Massacre the following year.<\/p>\n<p>The police charge sheet for Tang mentioned his involvement in &#8220;civil disobedience movements,&#8221; a commemoration of the death of Mao-era dissident Lin Zhao, and a June 4 meditation event.<\/p>\n<p>Also mentioned was his part in a campaign to end China&#8217;s &#8220;hukou&#8221; household registration system linking access to education and other public services to a person&#8217;s town of birth.<\/p>\n<p><b>Tortured in custody<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Both Tang and Wang say they were tortured while initially detained at Baiyun District Detention Center in Guangzhou. All three men are currently being held in the Guangzhou No. 1 Detention Center.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The verdict comes down amid President Xi Jinping\u2019s relentless persecution of human rights lawyers and many other figures in China\u2019s civil society,&#8221; CHRD said in a statement on its website.<\/p>\n<p>The New York-based Human Rights Watch (HRW) called on Beijing to overturn the convictions in a statement issued after the verdict and sentencing on Friday.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The Chinese government needs to stop equating peaceful criticism with subversion if it is to make any progress towards respecting rights,&#8221; HRW China director Sophie Richardson said in a statement on the group&#8217;s website.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The prosecution of three rights activists on such dubious charges shows how far Beijing needs to go.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>HRW said the case had also been marred by multiple procedural violations.<\/p>\n<p>Richardson said the sentences don\u2019t bode well for more than a dozen human rights lawyers facing similar charges following a nationwide police operation targeting more than 300 rights lawyers and rights activists.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The authorities should step in and end these prosecutions now,&#8221; she said.<\/p>\n<p><i><b>Reported by Yang Fan for RFA&#8217;s Mandarin Service, and by the Cantonese Service. Translated and written in English by Luisetta Mudie.<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n<p>Source: <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><a style=\"color: #0000ff;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.rfa.org\/english\/news\/china\/chinas-gandhi-jailed-for-five-years-in-guangzhou-three-verdict-01292016111614.html\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.rfa.org\/english\/news\/china\/chinas-gandhi-jailed-for-five-years-in-guangzhou-three-verdict-01292016111614.html<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Authorities in the southern Chinese prov &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/chinas-gandhi-jailed-for-five-years-in-guangzhou-three-verdict\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6451,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[35,43,136,1403],"tags":[1493,1485,128,1433],"views":5814,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6450"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6450"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6450\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6452,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6450\/revisions\/6452"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6451"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6450"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6450"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6450"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}