{"id":7987,"date":"2017-01-11T18:14:04","date_gmt":"2017-01-11T23:14:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/?p=7987"},"modified":"2017-01-12T09:29:51","modified_gmt":"2017-01-12T14:29:51","slug":"bill-of-indictment-against-human-rights-lawyer-xie-yang","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/bill-of-indictment-against-human-rights-lawyer-xie-yang","title":{"rendered":"Bill of Indictment Against Human Rights Lawyer Xie Yang"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"XieHunan Province Changsha Municipal People\u2019s Procuratorate<\/strong><\/h5>\n

Bill of Indictment<\/h3>\n

CS Proc Crim Indict [2016] No. 85<\/p>\n

Defendant Xie Yang (\u8c22\u9633), male, [redacted], Han ethnicity, master\u2019s degree education, was a practicing lawyer at Hunan Gangwei Law Firm, [redacted].On July 12, 2015, he was put under residential surveillance by the Changsha Municipal Public Security Bureau on suspicion of the crimes of subversion of state power and disrupting court order. On January 8, 2016 this procuratorate approved his arrest on suspicion of the crime of subversion of state power. The arrest was executed the following day by the Changsha Municipal Public Security Bureau.<\/p>\n

The Changsha Municipal Public Security Bureau has concluded its investigation of this case and, on August 8, 2016, referred the case to this procuratorate for prosecutorial review of defendant Xie Yang\u2019s culpability for the crimes of subversion of state power and disrupting court order. After receiving this case, the procuratorate on August 10, 2016, notified the defendant of his right to retain defense counsel, questioned the defendant in accordance with the law, heard the defense lawyer\u2019s opinions, and reviewed the complete set of documents in this case. Due to some unclear facts and insufficient proof, on August 17, 2016 and October 17, 2016, this procuratorate twice returned the case to the public security organ for additional investigation. After the public security organ completed additional investigation on September 17, 2016, and November 17, 2016, the case was again transferred to this procuratorate for review and prosecution.<\/p>\n

It is found upon review by law that:<\/p>\n

I. Crime of Subversion of State Power<\/p>\n

Defendant Xie Yang had long been influenced by the infiltration of anti-China forces and gradually formed his idea of overthrowing the current political system. Since 2012, Xie Yang has published many speeches attacking and defaming the government, judicial organs, and the state justice system, and openly incited others to subvert state power. He has also traveled abroad many times to receive training by overseas organizations. Through WeChat, Telegram, and other online methods\u2014and in the name of \u201cdefending rights\u201d\u2014he colluded with Zhai Yanmin (\u7fdf\u5ca9\u6c11), who was sentenced for the crime of subversion of state power, and other people inside and outside China who intended to overthrow our government to interfere and stir up incidents and events that happened in China in recent years. He attacked and slandered our country\u2019s current political system, incited others to overthrow our government and the socialist system by willfully distorting facts, incited others to unlawfully assemble in public to make provocations, and instigated people who did not know the facts to resent the government by making use of public opinion, severely harming national security and exacerbating social problems. Specific facts are as follows:
\n1.Since 2012, defendant Xie Yang registered on Sina two microblog IDs: \u201cXie Yang lawyer 911\u201d and \u201cLawyer Xie Yang 911.\u201d Through both he posted a large amount of writing attacking our government and current political system, advocating \u201coverthrowing the regime is a basic human right,\u201d and inciting others to overthrow our government. Upon investigation, it was found that more than ten thousand posts were posted on the above two microblog sites, with more than ten thousand followers. All the microblog posts were reposts of negative news about the government, judicial organs and the judicial and political systems of our country or negative comments on positive news and reports. About 180 or so posts directly attacked our government and incited the subversion of state power. These were read or clicked on around 300,000 times, and some of the microblog posts were heavily commented on and reposted.
\n2.In April 2015, defendant Xie Yang represented Xie Fengxia (\u8c22\u4e30\u590f) (aka: Xie Wenfei \u8c22\u6587\u98de) in his case on suspicion of the crime of subversion of state power. During the review and prosecution period of this case, Xie Yang visited Xie Fengxia as his defense attorney at the Guangzhou Detention Center. He then drafted an article titled \u201cAttorney Xie Yang\u2019s Meeting with Xie Wenfei\u201d and posted it online, openly advocating \u201cinciting to overthrow state power is not a crime and calling on everyone to work hard to end authoritarian rule.\u201d This article was reposted by some personal microblogs and overseas anti-China websites, creating adverse political effects.
\n3.In May 2015, a police attacker was shot and killed by a police officer in the waiting room of the Qing\u2019an County Railway Station in Heilongjiang Province. After this incident, Xie Yang, together with attorney Xie Yanyi (\u8c22\u71d5\u76ca), who was dealt with in another case on suspicion of the crime of inciting subversion of the state power, Liu Shuqing (\u5218\u4e66\u5e86) and others, traveled to Harbin and Qing\u2019an County of Heilongjiang Province to exploit this incident by gathering crowds to provoke trouble offline and encouraging confrontation online. At the same time, they gathered unlawfully and held signs and banners at the Heilongjiang Province Public Security Department, Heilongjiang Railway Administrative Bureau, the Qing\u2019an County Railway Station square, and the Qing\u2019an County government, proclaiming: \u201cHeaven and the people are angry at the killing of a citizen,\u201d and \u201cMake Qing\u2019an police accountable, exercise constitutional rights.\u201d He later published online the above-mentioned photos showing signs of the appeal and making fact-distorting speeches and statements to incite people who did not know the facts to oppose government organs.
\n4.On May 18, 2015, during his defense in a case involving an economic dispute in Nanning Municipality, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Xie Yang suffered a minor injury in his lower leg during a violent fight between people of both parties. The Nanning City Public Security Bureau promptly dispatched officers to deal with the situation. Xie Yang later posted on his microblog a speech on his being beaten to maliciously slander the Nanning Public Security Bureau, claiming that \u201cNanning police organized criminals to interfere with the economic dispute,\u201d and \u201cNanning police were the assailant,\u201d and hinting that he was being persecuted for his defense work in the Qing\u2019an incident, and inciting people who did not know the facts to oppose the government by defaming the government. After the said article was posted on his microblog, it was reposted and commented on by many media and internet forums, creating an adverse effect.<\/p>\n

The above criminal facts are supported by the following evidence:<\/p>\n

1. Material evidence such as photos of cellphone and computer(s); 2. Written evidence such as records of entry and exit, deleted microblog printouts provided by Beijing Weimeng Chuangke Net Technology Co., Ltd., explanation of case situation, household registration material; 3. Testimony by witnesses Wang Xun (\u738b\u52cb), Xie Fengxia (\u8c22\u4e30\u590f), and others; 4. Statement and argument by defendant Xie Yang; and 5. Electronic data.<\/p>\n

II. Disrupting Court Order<\/p>\n

From 2014 \u2014 March 2015, villagers from Shuangtang Group, Lianhu Village, Yuhua District, Changsha, Hunan, filed an administrative suit with the Changsha Municipality Yuhua District People\u2019s Court regarding their eminent domain home demolition matter. Defendant Xie Yang was hired as attorney to represent 17 of these villagers in the case. He told the villagers that even if they didn\u2019t win the case, they could use the delay of the trial to pressure the Yuhua District government to increase their compensation. To achieve this objective, defendant Xie Yang deputized non-lawyers Wang Quanping (\u738b\u5168\u5e73), Fan Biaowen (\u8303\u6807\u6587) and others to handle this case, and they asked the villagers to trust and support every action they did in the courtroom, and do everything they could to convene their relatives and friends to come to the court hearing. After that they used the Internet and telephone to gather many unrelated people to come to the court hearing to \u201csurround and watch\u201d (\u56f4\u89c2). On the morning of March 9, 2015, Changsha Municipality Yuhua District People\u2019s Court began to hear the case, the court decided that because Wang Quanping, Fan Biaowen and others didn\u2019t have the qualifications to represent the appellants as their legal agents, so it demanded that Wang and Fan leave the trial. Defendant Xie Yang slapped the table and abused and insulted the judge and used other methods to incite the litigants and trial observers to oppose the court\u2019s decision. A mob gathered and made a lot of noise and charged the court. The defendant Xie Yang and others obstructed the bailiffs\u2019 maintaining court order, seriously disrupting court order and causing the hearing to be delayed two hours.<\/p>\n

Evidence substantiating the above crimes is as follows:<\/p>\n

1. Cell phone and other material evidence photographs; 2. Notice to appear in court, observer register; court hearing transcript and other documented evidence; 3. Testimonies by witnesses Xiang Bin (\u5411\u658c), Zhang Libing (\u5f20\u8389\u658c), Zhou Jie (\u5468\u6770), etc.; 4. Defendant Xie Yang\u2019s deposition and defense; 5. Video and audio material from court hearing; 6. Digital data.<\/p>\n

This procuratorate maintains that defendant Xie Yang incited others to subvert state power and overthrow the socialist system, thus committing major criminal acts. He also assembled mobs to create chaos and attacked a court, seriously disrupting court order. These actions constitute a violation of Articles 105(2) and 309(9) of the Criminal Law of the People\u2019s Republic of China. The facts being clear and the evidence reliable and sufficient, defendant Xie Yang should be held criminally responsible for the crimes of subverting state power and disrupting court order. Therefore, in accordance with Article 72 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People\u2019s Republic of China, this procuratorate hereby submits its indictment and requests that punishment be imposed in accordance with the law.<\/p>\n

To: Hunan Province Changsha Municipal Intermediate People\u2019s Court<\/p>\n

Prosecutor: Fang Hui (\u65b9\u60e0)<\/p>\n

Acting Prosecutor: Li Zhiming (\u674e\u6cbb\u660e)<\/p>\n

December 16, 2016<\/p>\n

Notes and Attachments:
\n1.Defendant Xie Yang is currently detained in Changsha Number Two Detention Center.
\n2.Case file (14 volumes, 24 CD-ROM disks).
\n3.Witness List<\/p>\n

Source: https:\/\/chinachange.org\/2017\/01\/11\/bill-of-indictment-against-human-rights-lawyer-xie-yang\/<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Hunan Province Changsha Municipal People … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7988,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[35,136,1403],"tags":[570,1389],"views":4970,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7987"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7987"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7987\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7993,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7987\/revisions\/7993"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7988"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7987"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7987"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinesepen.org\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7987"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}