Gao Yu: Court upholds verdict for jailed Chinese journalist

Share on Google+

_86883454_030276003-1Ms Gao, seen here in a 2007 file picture, is a well-known investigative journalist

A Chinese court has upheld a guilty verdict against a senior journalist accused of leaking state secrets, her lawyer said.

Gao Yu did, however, receive a reduced sentence from seven years to five years in prison.

Ms Gao, who is 71, was found guilty last April and appealed her conviction at a closed hearing in Beijing.

Foreign governments and human rights groups have condemned the verdict calling it politically motivated.

The well-known investigative journalist was found guilty of sending an internal Communist Party document to Mingjing News, a Chinese-language website in the United States.

The document warned against the dangers of a free press and an independent civil society.

At the time of the original conviction the court had said that Ms Gao had “illegally provided state secrets to foreigners”.

Both Ms Gao and Mingjing News have denied she was the source of the leak.

Unpopular with authorities

The BBC’s Celia Hatton in Beijing says no reason was given by the court to explain the unusual reduction in her sentence.

Although many people have pressed for a lighter sentence in consideration of Ms Gao’s advanced age and her chronic heart problems.
Ms Gao’s son, Zhao Meng, told the BBC he was concerned his mother would not survive another lengthy period in prison, her third since 1989.

Our correspondent says many believe that Gao Yu is unpopular with the Chinese government because of her unrelenting reports focusing on China’s elite-level politics.

On the 2015 World Press Freedom Index compiled by the France-based organisation Reporters without Borders, China ranked 176th out of 180 countries.

News of Ms Gao’s upheld conviction attracted further criticism.
Prominent human rights activist Hu Jia tweeted in Mandarin: “Changing seven years to five years has no meaning, for innocent citizen Gao Yu to be detained for five minutes is already a violation of rights.”
For detail please visit here